Pamela Fayed’s Murder Marks The Beginning of the End for E-bullion
July 28th, 2008 was a Monday night like most other weeknights but as the sun set over the California coastline about 6:35 p.m. e-bullion’s Pamela Fayed was being murdered. This is a tragic event, a mother has died and she was someone the DGC industry knew very well. She leaves behind two young daughters.
By sunrise the next morning, all of the local news channels were running the story and a lot of details on the day to day operation of Goldfinger Coin & Bullion Sales were starting to appear on index pages across the Internet.
Most of the California television and newspapers focused on the fact that James Fayed and his estranged wife were going through a messy divorce. The early reports talked about court documents which had shown around $12 million in assets up for grabs in the divorce.
The Ventura County residents were fighting over their business assets, including $12 million in bank accounts and stores of gold and silver, according to court documents. [1]
Late Friday, August 1, just days after losing Pamela, the news broke that James Fayed was in Federal custody. It is important to note the he has not been charged with a crime relating to Pamela’s murder. James Fayed as the operator and signatory on GoldFinger/e-bullion bank accounts had been arrested for a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1960, which is operating an unlicensed money transmitting business.
It appears from the documentation that Fayed’s current money transmitting charge stems from e-bullion acting as third party receiver for alleged ponzi funds amounting to something like $20 million.
“…during a roughly eight-month period in 2005 and 2006, bank accounts in the name of GCB, over which defendant was a signatory (along with his deceased, estranged wife), received and transferred out over $20,000,000 in proceeds from Ponzi scheme victims. The victims did not intend to use defendant’s business to purchase gold or precious metals, as defendant’s website represents as the service offered by defendant’s company. Neither defendant nor the entities he admittedly controls were licensed to transfer such funds. Accordingly, defendant was charged with operating an unlicensed money transmitting business.” [2]
This charge is identical to the one received by Douglas Jackson of e-gold. (This is one of the charges he ‘plead guilty to’ in the recent e-gold plea agreement.)
A similar New York State Criminal charge was also used to arrest Arthur Budovsky and Vladimir Kats aka ‘Ragnar Danneskjoldof’ of GoldAge.net back in July 2006. Article 13-B of the New York banking law states that it is a felony to transfer money without a license. (charges whether State or Federal are just allegations and all parties are presumed innocent)
After Jim Fayed’s arrest, court documents began to surface on the Net such as restraining orders, bail documents, indictments and more. One web site even uncovered that James had gone bankrupt in 1997 and it seemed that all the dirty laundry was now coming out.
Almost all of this information either ‘by the piece’ or looking at the ‘big picture’, paints a grim picture for the future of e-bullion and Goldfinger Coin & Bullion Sales. The e-bullion web site has been reportedly offline for “maintenance” since August 5th. http://www.e-bullion.com However, the Goldfinger Coin and Bullion web site is still live and operating. http://www.goldfingercoin.com
05 August, 2008, 1:00pm PST: The e-Bullion website will be unavailable for a period of approximately four hours while our Tech Dept. performs routine maintenance.
An associated press story tried to make a connection between e-bullion, James Fayed and a federal fraud investigation, but no reliable source could confirm that information.
“The FBI is investigating possible fraud at a gold-trading business co-owned by a woman killed this week in a parking garage, an official with knowledge of the investigation told The Associated Press on Friday. The agency is investigating the activities of Goldfinger Coin & Bullion Sales, said the law enforcement official, who was not authorized to comment publicly because the probe was ongoing.” *By Thomas Watkins Associated Press Writer
After Jim’s arrest, the press had a field day with the information regarding the search of his residence.
“During the search of defendant’s residence, officers also found approximately $60,000 in cash wrapped in plastic material; approximately $3,000,000 in gold; and approximately 31 firearms, including one with a long-range night vision scope, along with thousands of rounds of matching ammunition. The cash and gold were seized.” [3]
The firearms were legally owned and left at the residence.
James Fayed’s bail which was originally set at $500,000 but he was not released, the government came back and argued further for his detention and today he still sits in a cell. How? The government has presented a reasonable argument to the court that this defendant is a flight risk and a danger.
“…this Court can and should conclude that defendant, at this time, has every reason to flee, and that no condition or combination of conditions can assure his appearance in this case.” [4]
Why? Among other reasons, the vehicle used in Pamela’s murder was caught on video and the tag traced to an Avis rentals very near to the e-bullion office. The American Express card used to rent the vehicle was not only in the name of James Fayed, but the exact card was found in his wallet during a search of his residence on August 1st.
“Pamela’s murderer left the crime scene in a red SUV that was captured on surveillance video, along with its license. The license was traced to Avis car rentals in Camarillo, not far from defendant’s business. The vehicle had been rented from Avis on July 3, 2008 using an American Express card issued to defendant and GCB. An American Express credit card with the same account number was found in defendant’s wallet during a search of his residence in the days following Pamela’s murder.” [5]
It’s is important for readers to note that James Fayed has not been charged in connection with his wife’s murder and not been convicted of any crime. In America, he remains innocent until proven otherwise. It is also very important to understand the full extent of the government’s investigation into Goldfinger/e-bullion. From the court documents we know that the original indictment was returned on February 26, 2008, (6 months ago) under seal, and as of today, the FBI is still investigating Goldfinger Coin & Bullion Sales and e-bullion.
Take a look at the creative way investigators gained access to the financial accounts on the Goldfinger/e-bullion accounts…
We can make a guess and say that around January or February of 2008 there were likely numerous signed complaints relating to lost funds from this large ponzi which was accepting funds through e-bullion. We can also assume since they became the target of the investigation that most of the complaints pointed a finger directly at the Goldfinger (GCB) bank accounts and e-bullion digital gold accounts. How did the government get access and control over these private statements without sending the subpoena right to James Fayed?
In October of 2007, James Fayed filed to divorce his wife Pamela. In April of 2008 a court appointed receiver was instructed to ‘examine and secure’ the gold holding and other assets under Jim’s control at their business location. This was routinely being done for the purpose of the divorce settlement.
“April 2008, defendant provided business records to Pamela’s forensic accountants, only after he was ordered to do so after resisting for months, in order to allow the accountants to ascertain the value of the marital estate and to provide information to set spousal support.” [6]
Now…. right here…this is where the plot thickens. It seems that while the records were at Pamela’s accountants, the government subpoenaed them through the accounting firm gaining access and copies to help build their criminal case against James.
“At that time, the government’s investigation into defendant’s business affairs remained underway and the government subpoenaed the accountants to produce the records they had obtained from defendant.” [7]
From this time in April when the first sealed indictment came back, it is not clear that James Fayed was ever aware of any government investigation right up to the point he was arrested. However, it’s clear the the accountants blabbed to Pamela about the subpoenaed records and Pamela, through here attorney, offered her assistance to the government.
“On or about June 24, 2008, Pamela’s then defense counsel advised the government that Pamela wanted to cooperate in its investigation.” [8]
James is not talking and that’s probably the smartest thing he has done yet.
“The government argued and continues to argue that defendant’s role as the primary suspect in Pamela’s murder makes him a serious risk of flight and a danger to others, whether or not Pamela was murdered in order to obstruct the present case. The facts show that defendant had become desperate. He was likely concerned that Pamela would cooperate and be a witness against him in this case.” [9]
As James sits in custody, the police and FBI are now searching for his brother Anthony Fayed and have labeled him a “person of Interest” in Pamela’s murder. Anthony Fayed, is a 53 year old convicted felon, ex-convict and drug abuser. He is now believed to be in possession of a handgun and on the run. One court document and separate article describes Anthony as being proud of his close connection to the violent white supremacist prison gang known as the Aryan Brotherhood (AB) or ‘The Brand’. Anthony is also currently being sought for an outstanding warrant on a previous legal matter.
Before her murder, Pamela had petitioned the Ventura County Superior Court in California for a restraining order against Anthony Fayed and was denied because of “insufficient facts.”
There are many other e-bullion problems that have not yet made it to the front page. Victims of yet another ponzi scam using e-bullion digital currency called ‘Invest Manager’, which apparently folded some time ago, are looking for their money back. These victims filed a class action suit against e-bullion believing that the proceeds may still be stored in e-bullion accounts. Lawyers in the suit stated they had some degree of success and cooperation from e-bullion on the location of scam funds.
‘Invest Manager’ was a typical HYIP (High Yield Investment Program) online ponzi scam promising 12 percent return a week. Dozens if not hundreds of these schemes are still in operation today and it is easy to find them. Most people consider them illegal, but digital currency operators love the income generated by the tiny mass payments. To locate some of the most popular scams operating today, Google “HYIP e-bullion” in your browser and have a long look at all the ‘investments’ and the interesting ways they are marketed to greedy victims. It’s very common to find hundreds of HYIP ‘investment’ ponzi scams at any one time operating across the Internet and accepting digital currency. Most scams now appear to be dropping e-bullion in favor of Liberty Reserve.
Meanwhile, the class-action lawsuit filed in Ventura County, which does not accuse e-bullion of any wrongdoing, is seeking as much as $5 million dollars. In classic ‘Internet’ fashion, the people behind Invest Manger have not been identified, nor has its headquarters or place of incorporation.
There has been no e-bullion reply to the ‘Invest Manager’ legal complaint, which was filed May 20. After the legal notice of the suit ran for a month, the judge can now determine how much the e-bullion owes and give the legal OK to retrieve the victims funds back from e-bullion (good luck).
Yet, another buried topic is the seizure of e-gold accounts in April of 2007. The massive government action against e-gold at that time included the seizure of 58 e-gold accounts including the popular 1MDC account, several large exchange agents and the account of The Bullion Exchange. http://www.thebullionexchange.com The web site still has some text information regarding the ‘money transmitter’ violation and legal action.
“The seizure order, under which the United States Government took control of the contents of The Bullion Exchange’s bank account is the subject of a civil action filed in the United States District Court in Delaware. The funds are being securely held by the judicial system pending a resolution of the civil litigation. The allegations contained in the complaint, contend, inter alia, that The Bullion Exchange failed to register, or secure a license to act as a money transmitter (in violation of 31 C.F.R. Section 103.11(uu)(5)(1)); additionally, the complaint contends that The Bullion Exchange failed to obtain a business license in the State of Delaware, violating 5 Del. Code Section 2303. The Bullion Exchange vehemently denies the allegations and has challenged all of the accusations contained in the civil complaint.”
Most casual observers are not aware of this but The Bullion Exchange was owned and operated by the Fayeds through Goldfinger. [a "source who was close to the Fayeds" explained this in great detail to me]
“The Bullion Exchange was just a part of Goldfinger. They deliberately used a different address and phone number. The purpose of the bullion exchange was to make it easy for people with money in e-gold to move it to e-Bullion. That’s the sole reason the Fayeds set it up. Pam pretty much ran the bullion exchange herself, it was the one little piece of the business Jim let her have control over.”
Here it seems is yet another government action pending against the Goldfinger business.
Is e-bullion done, finished and over? You tell me…James Fayed’s arraignment is set for August 18th.
[1] http://www.latimes.com/…story
[2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] http://www.dgcmagazine.com/blog/?p=202


Comment by TD on 11 August 2008:
Casual observer says
good read Mark
TDs last blog post..Mark Herpel DGC,magazine on.. Ebullion … Game Over?
Comment by Oluniyi David Ajao on 11 August 2008:
This is very serious. It appears e-bullion is gone for good this time. I am begining to get a bi worried about the digital gold currency world. Let’s hope Liberty Reserve is truly immune to all the troubles that are killing e-gold and e-bullion.
Oluniyi David Ajaos last blog post..ATM Woes in Nigeria: Your Financial Institution is NOT available
Comment by Shane Smith on 14 August 2008:
Mark,
I think it is important to note that some people who are upset with e-Bullion are known to be capable of making a forged credit card. You say
“the exact card was found in his wallet”
It might be more accurate to say that a similar card was found in his wallet. I can’t imagine the man who built e-Bullion was so stupid as to hire a hit man and rent a car for him to use from his neighbourhood Avis using his own credit card.
Shane
Comment by Mark on 14 August 2008:
Shane, thanks for the comment but I must not have made myself clear. James was known for renting cars for his employees. At least one long term employee had a car rented for him by James when he began working there in LA after moving. So I think what we were leading up to was not that James rented a car for the person who committed the murder, but that it was an employee or someone close to James that committed the murder. Either someone working there or had access to the car’s of an employee or friend. It’s not going to be hard for the police to track down this person, they might already have someone.
However, if it turns out that someone created a forged American Express credit card, broke into the Fayed household and planted it in the wallet and then left….I’ll give you a written apology.
My money is on an employee and/or the brother.
Mark
Comment by Mark on 14 August 2008:
Please also take into account Occam’s razor.
The simplest explanation or the most obvious one… is generally the correct explanation.
mh
Comment by Dave on 15 August 2008:
It is a shame that someone loses their life over what appears to be greed. When will man learn that happiness does not lie in the things he posesses.
Sad, Sad, Sad
Comment by Mark on 16 August 2008:
Dave that’s very true and words we should all live by…happiness is not that big house across the road.
Comment by Shane Smith on 16 August 2008:
Mark,
I’m not suggesting someone broke into the Fayed house to plant the card. I’m suggesting that a clone card could have been used to rent the car, then later the real card was found in James’ wallet.
It’s not difficult to make a clone card once the magnetic stripe has been read from the original one.
There is no way to tell after the fact if the car was rented with the original card, or a clone of that card.
Shane
Comment by Mark on 17 August 2008:
Thanks for that clarification, so you are saying someone could have cloned his card then used the copy to rent a car and frame him. Well I suppose it’s possible, I was not looking at it that way. The arraignment is just hours away now, so perhaps he will get release and get the biz back online. I think that will depend on if they froze the US bank accounts. Recently(last month) another digital gold company had their US bank accounts closed by the bank, not the DOJ and they had trouble getting new ones. We’ll see what happens I suppose. It would be great if he (1) gets out and (2) gets the web back online. That’s the long shot here I think.
Thanks for the comment Shane, I get it now.
Mark
Comment by Shane Smith on 17 August 2008:
There should be a signature on the rental agreement and perhaps the clerk will remember the transaction.
Seems that the bad guys are winning again. I often wonder what Andrew Jackson would think if he were here today.
Comment by Janet on 18 August 2008:
all i want is my money back, i don’t care if he’s guilty or not, all i know that i have my money there and also many other peoples money and that’s not a game…
Comment by marie ferraro on 11 March 2009:
Thanks for the info. What should I do now? I have invested in e-bullion and investment-manager.
Marie Ferraro
Comment by ninabbaby on 11 August 2009:
What ever happened to the brother; Anthony Fayed?
Comment by Mark on 13 August 2009:
Don’t know, seems he is still on the run. The old warrant for him is still valid so he is still being sought.
Mark
Comment by ninabbaby on 19 August 2009:
Thanks Mark!
Comment by tonybaby on 3 September 2009:
hey markie mark,
time for u to update ur info and get on the ball and stop spreading so much B.S. over the web.
the warrent is not valid,and tony is not on the run!! and never was. and jims brother had nothing to do w/any of the above. jims brother has been homeless for years because of the sick people @ goldfinger jim wouldn’t even buy his own brother a 99cent cheeseburger! Now jims brothers name is being slandered,lied about, and broadcast over the entire internet. U haven’t a clue about anything.
U should get on the Jerry Springer show.
Comment by Mark on 12 September 2009:
Well Tonybaby, my humble apologies if I have my facts incorrect but this post is over a year old. The facts were accurate at the time of the post and the comments. The story regarding Tony is OLD news. We hope they capture the person or people responsible for Pam’s death.
If you or Tony is not ‘on the run’ have you stopped by the police department yet to help them catch the killer or killers? I’m sure they have some important questions, and you could be of help.
Thank you for your comment
Mark